01 Validation Certified engine data
How wrong is it?
Every simulator should be able to answer that. This one is checked against 26 real engines whose fuel consumption is a matter of public certification record — from a 1968 Spey to a geared turbofan of 2016. The numbers below are computed live by the same solver the console runs, and every error is shown, including the ones that do not flatter the model.
Predicted against certified
Sea-level static takeoffEvery case
Sorted by bypass ratio| Engine | BPR | OPR | Tt4 assumed | Certified TSFC | PropulsionLab | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Running 26 engines through the solver… | ||||||
TSFC in lb of fuel per lbf of thrust per hour. Error is signed: positive means PropulsionLab predicts more fuel burn than the engine was certified at. Turbine temperature is assumed, not published — see below.
The shared assumption set
Applied identically to every engine on this page. Turbine inlet temperature is the one exception to being a single constant: it is tied to each engine's published pressure ratio, because a single value across five decades is knowingly unphysical — held at 1500 K, three of the modern engines have no solution at all, since a bypass-11 fan cannot be driven by a turbine that cold. The relation is anchored to historical practice and was fixed before any error was computed.
What is and is not validated
Reference data:
ICAO Aircraft Engine Emissions Databank,
read in machine-readable form via the
OpenAP
engine table (TU Delft). Every row above keeps its ICAO engine UID, so
any figure can be looked up against the primary source without going
through this site at all. The report itself is served live at
/validation/report,
and scripts/build_validation_set.py in the repository
regenerates the case file from scratch.